GeForce RTX 4050 vs Playstation 4 Slim GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated121
Place by popularitynot in top-10055
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameLiverpool 16nmAD107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 September 2016 (8 years ago)2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11522560
Core clock speed800 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2640 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate57.60211.2
Floating-point performance1.843 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Length288 mmno data
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed5.5 GB/s18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s216.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1*12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.11.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt

Playstation 4 Slim GPU has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4050, on the other hand, has a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Playstation 4 Slim GPU and GeForce RTX 4050. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Playstation 4 Slim GPU
Playstation 4 Slim GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GeForce RTX 4050

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 122 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Slim GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1747 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.