Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs Playstation 4 Pro GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNeoVega 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)1 October 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23044096
Core clock speed911 MHz1156 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1247 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate131.2319.2
Floating-point processing power4.198 TFLOPSno data
ROPs6464
TMUs144256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data152 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1700 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth217.6 GB/s409.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12.0
Shader Model6.05.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2016 1 October 2017
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 250 Watt

Playstation 4 Pro GPU has 66.7% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 64 Nano, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Playstation 4 Pro GPU and Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Playstation 4 Pro GPU is a notebook card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU
Playstation 4 Pro GPU
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 432 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Pro GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.