Radeon RX 7900 XT vs Playstation 4 Pro GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated14
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.55
Power efficiencyno data17.38
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNeoNavi 31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23045376
Core clock speed911 MHz1387 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2394 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate131.2804.4
Floating-point processing power4.198 TFLOPS51.48 TFLOPS
ROPs64192
TMUs144336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB20 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1700 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth217.6 GB/s800.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.06.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2016 3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 300 Watt

Playstation 4 Pro GPU has 100% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Playstation 4 Pro GPU and Radeon RX 7900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Playstation 4 Pro GPU is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU
Playstation 4 Pro GPU
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 429 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Pro GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1731 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.