Arc A770 vs P106-100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P102-101 P104-100 P104-101 P106-090 P106-100
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7 A770M Arc 7 A780 Arc A580 Arc A750 Arc A770 Arc A780

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P106-100 with Arc A770, including specs and performance data.

P106-100
2017
6 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
17.19

Arc A770 outperforms P106-100 by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P106-100 P106-100
Arc A770 Arc A770

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking331156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.22
Power efficiency9.8210.43
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGP106DG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date19 June 2017 (7 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12804096
Core clock speed1506 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed1709 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate136.7614.4
Floating-point processing power4.375 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs48128
TMUs80256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length250 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P106-100 17.19
Arc A770 34.26
+99.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P106-100 6607
Arc A770 13169
+99.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
−102%
111
+102%
1440p30−35
−107%
62
+107%
4K18−21
−122%
40
+122%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.96
1440pno data5.31
4Kno data8.23

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 179
+0%
179
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 132
+0%
132
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70
+0%
70
+0%
Far Cry 5 117
+0%
117
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 99
+0%
99
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 88
+0%
88
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Far Cry 5 109
+0%
109
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%
Metro Exodus 113
+0%
113
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 196
+0%
196
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 83
+0%
83
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+0%
58
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+0%
23
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 71
+0%
71
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+0%
15
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10
+0%
10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+0%
48
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+0%
73
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8
+0%
8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how P106-100 and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 102% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 107% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770 is 122% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 17.19 34.26
Recency 19 June 2017 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 225 Watt

P106-100 has 87.5% lower power consumption.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has a 99.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the P106-100 in performance tests.

Be aware that P106-100 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA P106-100
P106-100
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P106-100 P106 100
vs
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
Arc A770 Arc A770
vs
RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 56
P106-100 P106 100
vs
T600 T600
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile NVIDIA 3080 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB 1060 Max-Q 3 GB
RTX 4070 Mobile NVIDIA 4070 Mobile
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB 1060 Max-Q 3 GB
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Intel Xe Graphics G7 80EU
vs
PRO WX 2100 WX 2100
FX 4500 NVIDIA FX 4500
vs
PRO WX 3100 WX 3100
RTX 2060 Max-Q NVIDIA RTX 2060 Max-Q
vs
Xbox One X GPU X GPU
RTX 2060 12 GB NVIDIA RTX 2060 12 GB
vs
Instinct MI25 Instinct MI25
RTX A5500 Mobile RTX A5500 Mobile
vs
RX Vega XTX Vega XTX
GT 520 NVIDIA GT 520
vs
RX Vega 56 Vega 56
GTX 1080 Max-Q NVIDIA GTX 1080 Max-Q
vs
RX Vega 56 Vega 56
RTX 3000 Mobile NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile
vs
RX Vega 56 Vega 56

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 210 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5385 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about P106-100 or Arc A770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.