Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB vs NVS 5100M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 5100M with Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, including specs and performance data.

NVS 5100M
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 35 Watt
0.52

RX 6750 GRE 10 GB outperforms NVS 5100M by a whopping 9398% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking123064
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data92.47
Power efficiency1.0219.92
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGT216Navi 22
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482304
Core clock speed550 MHz1941 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2450 MHz
Number of transistors486 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate8.800352.8
Floating-point processing power0.1162 TFLOPS11.29 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB10 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s320.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 5100M 0.52
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 49.39
+9398%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 5100M 199
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 19031
+9463%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.52 49.39
Recency 7 January 2010 17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 170 Watt

NVS 5100M has 385.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, on the other hand, has a 9398.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 5100M in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 5100M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 5100M
NVS 5100M
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 35 votes

Rate NVS 5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 44 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.