Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVS 4200M

Place in the ranking	1159	269
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.07	23.83
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GF119	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	22 February 2011 (13 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	1024
Core clock speed	810 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	292 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	6.480	114.2
Floating-point processing power	0.1555 TFLOPS	3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	32
TMUs	8	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	MXM	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	12.8 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 4200M 0.75

T2000 Mobile 20.77
+2669%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 4200M 290

T2000 Mobile 7985
+2653%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

NVS 4200M 507

T2000 Mobile 13524
+2567%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−2592%

350−400
+2592%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −311%	35−40 +311%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −311%	35−40 +311%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −1157%	85−90 +1157%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −840%	45−50 +840%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −311%	35−40 +311%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −750%	65−70 +750%
Fortnite	2−3 −5350%	100−110 +5350%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −1157%	85−90 +1157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−11 −1280%	130−140 +1280%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −840%	45−50 +840%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −1000%	65−70 +1000%
World of Tanks	18−20 −1142%	230−240 +1142%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −311%	35−40 +311%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −750%	65−70 +750%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −1157%	85−90 +1157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−11 −1280%	130−140 +1280%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −4200%	170−180 +4200%
World of Tanks	3−4 −4567%	140−150 +4567%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −750%	16−18 +750%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1325%	55−60 +1325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1350%	27−30 +1350%
Valorant	5−6 −980%	50−55 +980%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −3000%	60−65 +3000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Dota 2	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Valorant	1−2 −2400%	24−27 +2400%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring

65−70

+0%

65−70

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Dota 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Elden Ring	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Dota 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Elden Ring	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Elden Ring	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Fortnite	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

This is how NVS 4200M and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

T2000 Mobile is 2592% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 5350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T2000 Mobile is ahead in 35 tests (56%)
there's a draw in 28 tests (44%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.75	20.77
Recency	22 February 2011	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	60 Watt

NVS 4200M has 140% lower power consumption.

T2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2669.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 4200M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.