ATI Radeon X1300 XT vs NVS 3100M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1226not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.59no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGT218RV530
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)12 August 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed606 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors260 million157 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt22 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8482.000
Floating-point processing power0.04698 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.13.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 12 August 2006
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 22 Watt

NVS 3100M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 57.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between NVS 3100M and Radeon X1300 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 3100M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon X1300 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 3100M
NVS 3100M
ATI Radeon X1300 XT
Radeon X1300 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 128 votes

Rate NVS 3100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 45 votes

Rate Radeon X1300 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.