Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs NVS 3100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 3100M with Radeon RX 6750 GRE, including specs and performance data.

NVS 3100M
2010
512 MB GDDR3, 14 Watt
0.53

RX 6750 GRE outperforms NVS 3100M by a whopping 9000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking121968
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data46.23
Power efficiency2.6313.40
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGT218Navi 22
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162560
Core clock speed606 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2581 MHz
Number of transistors260 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate4.848413.0
Floating-point processing power0.04698 TFLOPSno data
ROPs464
TMUs8160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 3100M 0.53
RX 6750 GRE 48.23
+9000%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 3100M 204
RX 6750 GRE 18613
+9024%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−8650%
350−400
+8650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−8900%
900−950
+8900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−8900%
2700−2750
+8900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−8650%
350−400
+8650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−8900%
900−950
+8900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−8900%
900−950
+8900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−8900%
2700−2750
+8900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−8650%
350−400
+8650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−8900%
900−950
+8900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−8900%
900−950
+8900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−8900%
2700−2750
+8900%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Hitman 3 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 48.23
Recency 7 January 2010 17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 250 Watt

NVS 3100M has 1685.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE, on the other hand, has a 9000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 3100M in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 3100M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 3100M
NVS 3100M
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE
Radeon RX 6750 GRE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 128 votes

Rate NVS 3100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 210 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.