GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile vs NVS 2100M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1277not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.25no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGT218GB203
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores168192
Core clock speed535 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors260 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm0 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate4.280512.0
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS32.77 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8256
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s1.01 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.210.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 175 Watt

NVS 2100M has 1490.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 5080 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between NVS 2100M and GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 2100M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 2100M
NVS 2100M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 9 votes

Rate NVS 2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.