ATI Radeon 9200 LE vs ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6931603
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.01no data
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameBroadway-XTRV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)1 May 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1600no data
Core clock speed700 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistorsno data36 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.000
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2x1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX118.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p53no data
Full HD54no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 7−8 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Fortnite 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Dota 2 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Fortnite 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 9−10 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Dota 2 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27−30 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 9−10 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 1 May 2003
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 28 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 LE, on the other hand, has 329% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire and Radeon 9200 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9200 LE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire or Radeon 9200 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.