Radeon HD 6650A vs ATI Mobility HD 560v
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 560v and Radeon HD 6650A, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
HD 6650A outperforms ATI Mobility HD 560v by a whopping 149% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1132 | 864 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 3.99 | 3.32 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) |
| GPU code name | M96 | Onega |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 19 April 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 514 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.352 TFLOPS | 0.576 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 32 | 24 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−133%
|
21−24
+133%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−133%
|
21−24
+133%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−133%
|
21−24
+133%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−133%
|
21−24
+133%
|
| Fortnite | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−145%
|
27−30
+145%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−133%
|
14−16
+133%
|
| World of Tanks | 21−24
−138%
|
50−55
+138%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−133%
|
21−24
+133%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−133%
|
21−24
+133%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−145%
|
27−30
+145%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
| World of Tanks | 4−5
−125%
|
9−10
+125%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−133%
|
21−24
+133%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Valorant | 6−7
−133%
|
14−16
+133%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−133%
|
35−40
+133%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−133%
|
35−40
+133%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−133%
|
35−40
+133%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−133%
|
35−40
+133%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.87 | 2.17 |
| Recency | 5 May 2010 | 19 April 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
ATI Mobility HD 560v has 200% lower power consumption.
HD 6650A, on the other hand, has a 149.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon HD 6650A is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 560v in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
