RTX A500 Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 560v

Place in the ranking	1138	321
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.00	20.10
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	M96	GA107S
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	5 May 2010 (14 years ago)	22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	2048
Core clock speed	550 MHz	832 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1537 MHz
Number of transistors	514 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	17.60	98.37
Floating-point processing power	0.352 TFLOPS	6.296 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	48
TMUs	32	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.6
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 560v 0.84

RTX A500 Mobile 16.88
+1910%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI Mobility HD 560v 2460

RTX A500 Mobile 40923
+1564%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	2−3 −2100%	44 +2100%
1440p	1−2 −2600%	27 +2600%
4K	-0−1	4

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −282%	42 +282%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −191%	32 +191%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −986%	76 +986%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −720%	40−45 +720%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −118%	24 +118%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −767%	78 +767%
Fortnite	2−3 −4650%	95−100 +4650%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −786%	62 +786%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −1000%	120−130 +1000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −720%	40−45 +720%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −800%	50−55 +800%
World of Tanks	21−24 −919%	210−220 +919%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −81.8%	20 +81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −567%	60−65 +567%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −671%	54 +671%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −1000%	120−130 +1000%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −3160%	160−170 +3160%
World of Tanks	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Valorant	6−7 −633%	40−45 +633%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −2500%	50−55 +2500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	10−12
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Dota 2	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Valorant	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Valorant	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Dota 2	44 +0%	44 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	66 +0%	66 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Valorant	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Dota 2	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Valorant	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30 +0%	30 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30 +0%	30 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	39 +0%	39 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	2 +0%	2 +0%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Fortnite	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 560v and RTX A500 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX A500 Mobile is 2100% faster in 1080p
RTX A500 Mobile is 2600% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A500 Mobile is 4650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX A500 Mobile is ahead in 35 tests (56%)
there's a draw in 28 tests (44%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.84	16.88
Recency	5 May 2010	22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	60 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 560v has 300% lower power consumption.

RTX A500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1909.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 560v in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 560v is a notebook graphics card while RTX A500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.