Radeon RX 560X vs ATI Mobility HD 550v
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 550v with Radeon RX 560X, including specs and performance data.
560X outperforms Mobility HD 550v by a whopping 1018% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1225 | 557 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 5.62 | 8.38 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | M96 | Polaris 21 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 May 2010 (15 years ago) | 11 April 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1175 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1275 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 514 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 14.40 | 81.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.288 TFLOPS | 2.611 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 1024 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 170 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 20
−1000%
| 220−230
+1000%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1000%
|
55−60
+1000%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−963%
|
85−90
+963%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−934%
|
300−310
+934%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 21−24
−995%
|
230−240
+995%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
| Dota 2 | 12−14
−977%
|
140−150
+977%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1000%
|
55−60
+1000%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−963%
|
85−90
+963%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−983%
|
65−70
+983%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−934%
|
300−310
+934%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
| Dota 2 | 12−14
−977%
|
140−150
+977%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1000%
|
55−60
+1000%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−963%
|
85−90
+963%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−983%
|
65−70
+983%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−934%
|
300−310
+934%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−900%
|
30−33
+900%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−963%
|
85−90
+963%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−971%
|
150−160
+971%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
This is how ATI Mobility HD 550v and RX 560X compete in popular games:
- RX 560X is 1000% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.73 | 8.16 |
| Recency | 5 May 2010 | 11 April 2018 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 75 Watt |
ATI Mobility HD 550v has 650% lower power consumption.
RX 560X, on the other hand, has a 1018% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 560X is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 550v in performance tests.
Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 550v is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 560X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
