Quadro GV100 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470

Place in the ranking	1204	52
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	2.74
Power efficiency	2.80	14.18
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code name	Park	GV100
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	7 January 2010 (15 years ago)	27 March 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$8,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	5120
Core clock speed	750 MHz	1132 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1627 MHz
Number of transistors	292 million	21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	6.000	520.6
Floating-point processing power	0.12 TFLOPS	16.66 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	128
TMUs	8	320
Tensor Cores	no data	640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	32 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	848 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	868.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 5470 0.61

Quadro GV100 51.57
+8354%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI Mobility HD 5470 236

Quadro GV100 19824
+8300%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −8233%	500−550 +8233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −8233%	250−260 +8233%
Elden Ring	0−1	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −8233%	500−550 +8233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −8233%	250−260 +8233%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −8233%	500−550 +8233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −7900%	400−450 +7900%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −8233%	500−550 +8233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −8233%	250−260 +8233%
Elden Ring	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	8−9 −8025%	650−700 +8025%
Fortnite	1−2 −7900%	80−85 +7900%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −8233%	500−550 +8233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −8233%	750−800 +8233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −7900%	400−450 +7900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −7900%	400−450 +7900%
World of Tanks	16−18 −8135%	1400−1450 +8135%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −8233%	500−550 +8233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −8233%	250−260 +8233%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −8025%	650−700 +8025%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −8233%	500−550 +8233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −8233%	750−800 +8233%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −8233%	250−260 +8233%
World of Tanks	2−3 −7900%	160−170 +7900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −8338%	2700−2750 +8338%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −8233%	250−260 +8233%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −7400%	300−310 +7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −7400%	300−310 +7400%
Valorant	5−6 −7900%	400−450 +7900%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −8233%	1250−1300 +8233%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −8233%	1250−1300 +8233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −7900%	80−85 +7900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −8233%	1250−1300 +8233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −7900%	160−170 +7900%
Dota 2	14−16 −8233%	1250−1300 +8233%
Valorant	1−2 −7900%	80−85 +7900%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.61	51.57
Recency	7 January 2010	27 March 2018
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	32 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	250 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5470 has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

Quadro GV100, on the other hand, has a 8354.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro GV100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5470 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5470 is a notebook card while Quadro GV100 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.