Radeon RX 6900 XT vs ATI Mobility HD 5430

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5430 with Radeon RX 6900 XT, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 5430
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 7 Watt
0.33

RX 6900 XT outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5430 by a whopping 20979% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking130423
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.52
Power efficiency3.2515.96
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameParkNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores805120
Core clock speed500 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2250 MHz
Number of transistors292 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000720.0
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS23.04 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1188
1440p0−1130
4K-0−181

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.31
1440pno data7.68
4Kno data12.33

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1950%
160−170
+1950%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−7950%
160−170
+7950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1950%
160−170
+1950%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3700%
76
+3700%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−7680%
350−400
+7680%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−3075%
120−130
+3075%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1950%
160−170
+1950%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3100%
64
+3100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−2100%
130−140
+2100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−7680%
350−400
+7680%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2971%
210−220
+2971%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−3000%
124
+3000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3380%
170−180
+3380%
World of Tanks 12−14
−2046%
270−280
+2046%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1950%
160−170
+1950%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2550%
53
+2550%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−2100%
130−140
+2100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−7680%
350−400
+7680%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2971%
210−220
+2971%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−8650%
170−180
+8650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−933%
90−95
+933%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1700%
36
+1700%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−7600%
150−160
+7600%
Valorant 5−6
−6460%
328
+6460%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−940%
150−160
+940%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−940%
150−160
+940%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−20800%
200−210
+20800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−947%
150−160
+947%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 90−95
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1600%
17
+1600%
Dota 2 14−16
−940%
150−160
+940%
Valorant 1−2
−18400%
185
+18400%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 126
+0%
126
+0%
Valorant 480
+0%
480
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Dota 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Elden Ring 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 123
+0%
123
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Dota 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 411
+0%
411
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Elden Ring 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
World of Tanks 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Metro Exodus 117
+0%
117
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Elden Ring 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 67
+0%
67
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55
+0%
55
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6900 XT is 20800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6900 XT is ahead in 32 tests (52%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 69.56
Recency 7 January 2010 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 300 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5430 has 4185.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6900 XT, on the other hand, has a 20978.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5430 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5430 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430
Mobility Radeon HD 5430
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 14 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3841 vote

Rate Radeon RX 6900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.