Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI Mobility HD 5145

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5145 with Radeon Pro WX 8200, including specs and performance data.


ATI Mobility HD 5145
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 15 Watt
0.41

Pro 8200 outperforms Mobility HD 5145 by a whopping 7244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1326211
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.65
Power efficiency2.1010.08
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameM92Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores803584
Core clock speed720 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors242 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate5.760336.0
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8224
L1 Cache16 KB896 KB
L2 Cache64 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6900%
70−75
+6900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6900%
70−75
+6900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7150%
290−300
+7150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−7043%
500−550
+7043%
Valorant 24−27
−7208%
1900−1950
+7208%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−7233%
1100−1150
+7233%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6900%
70−75
+6900%
Dota 2 10−11
−6900%
700−750
+6900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7150%
290−300
+7150%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−7043%
500−550
+7043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
Valorant 24−27
−7208%
1900−1950
+7208%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6900%
70−75
+6900%
Dota 2 10−11
−6900%
700−750
+6900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7150%
290−300
+7150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−7043%
500−550
+7043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
Valorant 24−27
−7208%
1900−1950
+7208%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−7233%
220−230
+7233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−6900%
70−75
+6900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−7150%
290−300
+7150%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−6900%
70−75
+6900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6900%
70−75
+6900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−7043%
1000−1050
+7043%
Valorant 2−3
−6900%
140−150
+6900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−6900%
70−75
+6900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−6900%
140−150
+6900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.41 30.11
Recency 7 January 2010 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 230 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5145 has 1433% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 8200, on the other hand, has a 7244% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5145 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5145 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 45 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5145 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 29 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5145 or Radeon Pro WX 8200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.