ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs ATI Mobility HD 4870

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4870 with Radeon 9200 PRO, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 4870
2009
512 MB GDDR3
2.14
+21300%

ATI Mobility HD 4870 outperforms ATI 9200 PRO by a whopping 21300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8711528
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.02
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameM98RV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2009 (16 years ago)1 May 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800no data
Core clock speed550 MHz239 MHz
Number of transistors956 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data28 Watt
Texture fill rate22.000.96
Floating-point processing power0.88 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs404

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed888 MHz164 MHz
Memory bandwidth56.83 GB/s5.248 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)8.1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Elden Ring 3−4 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 5−6 0−1
Elden Ring 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Fortnite 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 0−1
World of Tanks 40−45 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
World of Tanks 14−16 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1
Valorant 8−9 0−1

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Elden Ring 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Valorant 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.14 0.01
Recency 9 January 2009 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm

ATI Mobility HD 4870 has a 21300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9200 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is a notebook card while Radeon 9200 PRO is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870
Mobility Radeon HD 4870
ATI Radeon 9200 PRO
Radeon 9200 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 9 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.