GeForce MX230 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4870 and GeForce MX230, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 4870
2009
512 MB GDDR3
2.13

MX230 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4870 by a whopping 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking869645
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data32.55
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameM98GP108
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 January 2009 (15 years ago)21 February 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800256
Core clock speed550 MHz1519 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1582 MHz
Number of transistors956 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rate22.0025.31
Floating-point processing power0.88 TFLOPS0.81 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed888 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth56.83 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
+33.3%
21
−33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−85.7%
13
+85.7%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−850%
19
+850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−180%
14
+180%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−367%
14
+367%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−240%
17
+240%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−556%
59
+556%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−72.2%
30−35
+72.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−130%
23
+130%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−129%
16
+129%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−550%
13
+550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−160%
13
+160%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−300%
12
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−140%
12
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−489%
53
+489%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−72.2%
30−35
+72.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+16.7%
6
−16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−80%
9
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−133%
7
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−33.3%
12
+33.3%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−72.2%
30−35
+72.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+33.3%
9
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Hitman 3 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 13
+0%
13
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4870 and GeForce MX230 compete in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 4870 is 33% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 4870 is 33% faster.
  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX230 is 850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 4870 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • GeForce MX230 is ahead in 52 tests (78%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (19%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.13 4.75
Recency 9 January 2009 21 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm

GeForce MX230 has a 123% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX230 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870
Mobility Radeon HD 4870
NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GeForce MX230

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 9 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1389 votes

Rate GeForce MX230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.