ATI Radeon 9250 vs ATI Mobility HD 4850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10261609
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameM98RV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2009 (17 years ago)1 March 2004 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800no data
Core clock speed500 MHz240 MHz
Number of transistors956 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate20.000.96
Floating-point processing power0.8 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs404
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth54.4 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)8.1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD41no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Fortnite 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Fortnite 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 no data
Metro Exodus 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data
Valorant 7−8 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 7−8 no data

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 January 2009 1 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm

ATI Mobility HD 4850 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 173% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and Radeon 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9250 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 4 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 56 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4850 or Radeon 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.