GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850

Place in the ranking	944	126
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	22.57
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	M98	GA104
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	9 January 2009 (15 years ago)	12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	800	5120
Core clock speed	500 MHz	1110 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1560 MHz
Number of transistors	956 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	125 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.00	249.6
Floating-point processing power	0.8 TFLOPS	15.97 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	80
TMUs	40	160
Tensor Cores	no data	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	850 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	54.4 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.5
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 4850 1.65

RTX 3070 Mobile 37.23
+2156%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI Mobility HD 4850 5264

RTX 3070 Mobile 77148
+1366%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	39 −195%	115 +195%
1440p	3−4 −2300%	72 +2300%
4K	2−3 −2300%	48 +2300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−2875%

119
+2875%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −1217%	75−80 +1217%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −1420%	75−80 +1420%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2575%	107 +2575%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3950%	80−85 +3950%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −2225%	90−95 +2225%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −3620%	180−190 +3620%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1800%	114 +1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −881%	150−160 +881%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −2833%	85−90 +2833%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −1400%	130−140 +1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −271%	120−130 +271%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −3033%	188 +3033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −1420%	75−80 +1420%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2100%	88 +2100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3950%	80−85 +3950%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −2225%	90−95 +2225%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −3620%	180−190 +3620%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1667%	106 +1667%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −881%	150−160 +881%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −2600%	81 +2600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −1933%	183 +1933%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −542%	75−80 +542%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −432%	181 +432%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −1217%	75−80 +1217%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −1420%	75−80 +1420%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1750%	74 +1750%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3950%	80−85 +3950%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −3240%	167 +3240%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1533%	98 +1533%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −725%	132 +725%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −1767%	168 +1767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −683%	94 +683%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −76.5%	60 +76.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−2633%

82
+2633%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −3450%	70−75 +3450%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −2750%	55−60 +2750%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −4300%	40−45 +4300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −4600%	47 +4600%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2050%	40−45 +2050%
Hitman 3	7−8 −871%	68 +871%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −2140%	112 +2140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −5200%	50−55 +5200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −1888%	159 +1888%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−1725%

73
+1725%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−3000%

30−35
+3000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1150%	24−27 +1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −3200%	33 +3200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	21−24
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2100%	21−24 +2100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	27

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−1367%

44
+1367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	91 +0%	91 +0%
Battlefield 5	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	76 +0%	76 +0%
Battlefield 5	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Metro Exodus	143 +0%	143 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	53 +0%	53 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Metro Exodus	91 +0%	91 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	125 +0%	125 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Hitman 3	38 +0%	38 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	119 +0%	119 +0%
Metro Exodus	71 +0%	71 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	64 +0%	64 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	22 +0%	22 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	93 +0%	93 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	71 +0%	71 +0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4850 and RTX 3070 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3070 Mobile is 195% faster in 1080p
RTX 3070 Mobile is 2300% faster in 1440p
RTX 3070 Mobile is 2300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3070 Mobile is 5200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 3070 Mobile is ahead in 51 test (73%)
there's a draw in 19 tests (27%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.65	37.23
Recency	9 January 2009	12 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	8 nm

RTX 3070 Mobile has a 2156.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.