Radeon R5 220 OEM vs ATI Mobility HD 4650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1095not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.07no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameM96Cedar
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2009 (15 years ago)21 December 2013 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32080
Core clock speed500 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors514 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt19 Watt
Texture fill rate16.005.200
Floating-point processing power0.32 TFLOPS0.104 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz533 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s8.528 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 January 2009 21 December 2013
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 19 Watt

R5 220 OEM has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 84.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 4650 and Radeon R5 220 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is a notebook card while Radeon R5 220 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
Radeon R5 220 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 91 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 195 votes

Rate Radeon R5 220 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.