Radeon HD 8370D IGP vs ATI Mobility HD 4650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1093not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.05no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameM96Scrapper Lite
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2009 (15 years ago)July 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320128
Core clock speed500 MHz760 MHz
Number of transistors514 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate16.006.080
Floating-point processing power0.32 TFLOPS0.1946 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 55 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 4650 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

HD 8370D IGP, on the other hand, has a 71.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 4650 and Radeon HD 8370D IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is a notebook card while Radeon HD 8370D IGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
Radeon HD 8370D IGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 91 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 99 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8370D IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.