GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570

Place in the ranking	1306	397
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	12.02
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	M92	GP107
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	9 January 2009 (16 years ago)	21 May 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	768
Core clock speed	680 MHz	1392 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1518 MHz
Number of transistors	242 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	5.440	72.86
Floating-point processing power	0.1088 TFLOPS	2.332 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	24
TMUs	8	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	3 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth	12.8 GB/s	84.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 −3650%	75−80 +3650%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −3614%	260−270 +3614%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 −3650%	75−80 +3650%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −3614%	260−270 +3614%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −3567%	110−120 +3567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −3614%	260−270 +3614%
Valorant	24−27 −3554%	950−1000 +3554%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 −3650%	75−80 +3650%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −3614%	260−270 +3614%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	14−16 −3471%	500−550 +3471%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Dota 2	10−11 −3400%	350−400 +3400%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −3567%	110−120 +3567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −3614%	260−270 +3614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −3650%	150−160 +3650%
Valorant	24−27 −3554%	950−1000 +3554%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −3614%	260−270 +3614%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Dota 2	10−11 −3400%	350−400 +3400%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −3567%	110−120 +3567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −3614%	260−270 +3614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −3650%	150−160 +3650%
Valorant	24−27 −3554%	950−1000 +3554%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−3650%

75−80
+3650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart	0−1	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −3567%	550−600 +3567%
Valorant	2−3 −3650%	75−80 +3650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −3650%	75−80 +3650%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

2−3

−3650%

75−80
+3650%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.35	13.16
Recency	9 January 2009	21 May 2018
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	3 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	14 nm

GTX 1050 3 GB has a 3660% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4570 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4570 is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Mobility Radeon HD 4570

GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Mobility Radeon HD 4570

GeForce G105M

GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

GeForce GTX 1050

Mobility Radeon HD 4570

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 55 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.6 355 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4570 or GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.