CMP 30HX vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4550 with CMP 30HX, including specs and performance data.


ATI Mobility HD 4550
2010
512 MB GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
0.35

CMP 30HX outperforms Mobility HD 4550 by a whopping 3551% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1352430
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.42
Power efficiencyno data7.87
ArchitectureTerascale 1 (2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameM92TU116
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 January 2010 (16 years ago)25 February 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores801408
Core clock speed550 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors242 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data125 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400157.1
Floating-point processing power0.088 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs888
L1 Cacheno data1.4 MB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, DDR2, DDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−3400%
350−400
+3400%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.28

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3400%
140−150
+3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−3471%
250−260
+3471%
Valorant 24−27
−3362%
900−950
+3362%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−3471%
500−550
+3471%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Dota 2 10−11
−3400%
350−400
+3400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3400%
140−150
+3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−3471%
250−260
+3471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Valorant 24−27
−3362%
900−950
+3362%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Dota 2 10−11
−3400%
350−400
+3400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3400%
140−150
+3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−3471%
250−260
+3471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Valorant 24−27
−3362%
900−950
+3362%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−3400%
140−150
+3400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−3471%
500−550
+3471%
Valorant 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4550 and CMP 30HX compete in popular games:

  • CMP 30HX is 3400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 12.78
Recency 1 January 2010 25 February 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm

CMP 30HX has a 3551% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358% more advanced lithography process.

The CMP 30HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4550 is a notebook graphics card while CMP 30HX is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 37 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 52 votes

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4550 or CMP 30HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.