GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4530

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4530 with GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 4530
2009
512 MB GDDR3
0.35

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4530 by a whopping 22960% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12948
Place by popularitynot in top-10091
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.96
Power efficiencyno data19.99
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameM92AD103
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2009 (16 years ago)8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores808448
Core clock speed500 MHz2340 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2610 MHz
Number of transistors242 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data285 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000689.0
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8264
Tensor Coresno data264
Ray Tracing Coresno data66

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s672.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1226
1440p0−1159
4K-0−195

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.54
1440pno data5.03
4Kno data8.41

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−1618%
189
+1618%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−21567%
650−700
+21567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−1618%
189
+1618%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−21567%
650−700
+21567%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−7683%
467
+7683%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−3775%
150−160
+3775%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−1455%
171
+1455%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−21567%
650−700
+21567%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−2043%
150
+2043%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−7267%
442
+7267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2971%
210−220
+2971%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−3775%
150−160
+3775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3380%
170−180
+3380%
World of Tanks 12−14
−2046%
270−280
+2046%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−1264%
150
+1264%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−21567%
650−700
+21567%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−2071%
150−160
+2071%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−6683%
407
+6683%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2971%
210−220
+2971%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−2967%
90−95
+2967%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−8650%
170−180
+8650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−21567%
650−700
+21567%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−3875%
159
+3875%
Valorant 5−6
−8040%
400−450
+8040%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−1113%
182
+1113%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1113%
182
+1113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−20800%
200−210
+20800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1113%
182
+1113%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 90−95
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−22400%
450−500
+22400%
Dota 2 14−16
−22900%
3450−3500
+22900%
Valorant 1−2
−23800%
230−240
+23800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Dota 2 174
+0%
174
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 174
+0%
174
+0%
Metro Exodus 79
+0%
79
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 155
+0%
155
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 155
+0%
155
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
World of Tanks 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 306
+0%
306
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 72
+0%
72
+0%
Metro Exodus 84
+0%
84
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 22
+0%
22
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 162
+0%
162
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 23800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is ahead in 25 tests (45%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (55%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 80.71
Recency 9 January 2009 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a 22960% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4530 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4530 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4530
Mobility Radeon HD 4530
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 18 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3204 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.