Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs ATI Mobility HD 4330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1379not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameM92Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2009 (17 years ago)1 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores804096
Core clock speed450 MHz1156 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1247 MHz
Number of transistors242 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600319.2
Floating-point processing power0.072 TFLOPSno data
ROPs464
TMUs8256
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data152 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s409.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12.0
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 January 2009 1 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm

RX Vega 64 Nano has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 4330 and Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 63 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4330 or Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.