Radeon 740M vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5250

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated500
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data38.37
Architectureno dataRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameM56GLPhoenix
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 January 2007 (17 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17256
Core clock speed5 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors157 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate5.40040.00
Floating-point processing powerno data2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs128
TMUs1216
Ray Tracing Coresno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR/DDR2/GDDR3/GDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed330 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2007 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm

Radeon 740M has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility FireGL V5250 and Radeon 740M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility FireGL V5250 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 740M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility FireGL V5250
Mobility FireGL V5250
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility FireGL V5250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 68 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.