ATI Radeon X800 XL vs ATI Mobility FireGL 7800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameM7R430
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date29 September 2001 (23 years ago)1 December 2004 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2no data
Core clock speed280 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed280 MHzno data
Number of transistors60 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt49 Watt
Texture fill rate0.566.400
ROPs216
TMUs216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz490 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s31.36 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.09.0b (9_2)
OpenGL1.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2001 1 December 2004
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 49 Watt

ATI Mobility FireGL 7800 has 81.5% lower power consumption.

ATI X800 XL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 36.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility FireGL 7800 and Radeon X800 XL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility FireGL 7800 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon X800 XL is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility FireGL 7800
Mobility FireGL 7800
ATI Radeon X800 XL
Radeon X800 XL

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility FireGL 7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15 votes

Rate Radeon X800 XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.