ATI Radeon HD 4270 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Maxwell GPU Surface Book and Radeon HD 4270, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Maxwell GPU Surface Book outperforms ATI HD 4270 by a whopping 1221% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 715 | 1345 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2017) | RV6xx (2008−2010) |
| GPU code name | Surface Book | RS880M |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 October 2015 (9 years ago) | 1 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 590 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 10.1 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 24
+2300%
| 1−2
−2300%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+240%
|
5−6
−240%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
+200%
|
4−5
−200%
|
| Valorant | 7−8 | 0−1 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+233%
|
6−7
−233%
|
| Fortnite | 21−24
+2000%
|
1−2
−2000%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+240%
|
5−6
−240%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+450%
|
6−7
−450%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
+200%
|
4−5
−200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+225%
|
4−5
−225%
|
| Valorant | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 60−65
+433%
|
12−14
−433%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+233%
|
6−7
−233%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+240%
|
5−6
−240%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+450%
|
6−7
−450%
|
| Valorant | 7−8 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
+1200%
|
2−3
−1200%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 24−27
+2500%
|
1−2
−2500%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Valorant | 10−12
+175%
|
4−5
−175%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 3−4 | 0−1 |
This is how Maxwell GPU Surface Book and ATI HD 4270 compete in popular games:
- Maxwell GPU Surface Book is 2300% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Maxwell GPU Surface Book is 1200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Maxwell GPU Surface Book is ahead in 29 tests (94%)
- there's a draw in 2 tests (6%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.70 | 0.28 |
| Recency | 1 October 2015 | 1 May 2010 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Maxwell GPU Surface Book has a 1221.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Maxwell GPU Surface Book is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4270 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
