Radeon RX 6600 XT vs Matrox Parhelia HR256

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated90
Place by popularitynot in top-10075
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data65.18
ArchitectureParhelia (2002−2006)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameParhelia-512Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateSeptember 2003 (21 year ago)30 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed200 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2589 MHz
Number of transistors80 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data160 (TGP) Watt
Texture fill rate3.200331.4
Floating-point performanceno data10.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCI-XPCIe 4.0 x8
Length190 mm190 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MBps16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x LFH601x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 7 nm

RX 6600 XT has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Parhelia HR256 and Radeon RX 6600 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Parhelia HR256
Parhelia HR256
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Parhelia HR256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 4007 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.