RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs Jetson Nano GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated13
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.06
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM20BAD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMarch 2019 (5 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12812800
Core clock speed640 MHz1155 MHz
Boost clock speed921 MHz2550 MHz
Number of transistors2,000 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology20 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate14.741,020
Floating-point processing power0.2358 TFLOPS65.28 TFLOPS
ROPs16176
TMUs16400
Tensor Coresno data400
Ray Tracing Coresno data100

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.11.3
CUDA5.38.9

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 20 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 250 Watt

Jetson Nano GPU has 2400% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Jetson Nano GPU and RTX 5000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Jetson Nano GPU is a notebook card while RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU
Jetson Nano GPU
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 16 votes

Rate Jetson Nano GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 75 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.