RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated73
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data81.91
Power efficiencyno data45.74
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA10BAD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMarch 2023 (1 year ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482816
Core clock speed1300 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2130 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate83.20187.4
Floating-point processing power5.325 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs6488
Tensor Cores6488
Ray Tracing Coresno data22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 70 Watt

Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 60% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB and RTX 2000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 11 votes

Rate Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 26 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.