Radeon R9 M275 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon R9 M275, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.93
+278%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms R9 M275 by a whopping 278% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking425783
Place by popularity35not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.14
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeVenus
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)28 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96640
Core clock speedno data900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data925 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data37.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.184 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 10.93
+278%
R9 M275 2.89

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 6710
+106%
R9 M275 3261

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 4820
+156%
R9 M275 1885

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 38040
+232%
R9 M275 11459

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+275%
24
−275%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data33.33

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+373%
14−16
−373%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+164%
21−24
−164%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+373%
14−16
−373%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+164%
21−24
−164%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+373%
14−16
−373%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+308%
12−14
−308%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+300%
12−14
−300%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 and R9 M275 compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 275% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 1067% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 28 tests (46%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.93 2.89
Recency 15 August 2020 28 January 2014
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 has a 278.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M275 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
AMD Radeon R9 M275
Radeon R9 M275

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2455 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.