Radeon Pro W5300M vs Iris Xe Graphics G4
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Generation 12.0 (2020) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) |
GPU code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | Navi 14 |
Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 2 September 2020 (3 years ago) | 13 November 2019 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 1280 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Number of transistors | no data | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 85 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 100.0 |
Floating-point performance | 0.8448 gflops | 3.2 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2.131 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 2 September 2020 | 13 November 2019 |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 85 Watt |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 has an age advantage of 9 months, and 466.7% lower power consumption.
Pro W5300M, on the other hand, has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G4 and Radeon Pro W5300M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G4 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W5300M is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.