Radeon PRO V710 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking690not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.96no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3eNavi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843456
Core clock speed300 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors189 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40432.0
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs696
TMUs48216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared28 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared224 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.1.801.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2014 3 October 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 158 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 953.3% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 13 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.