Radeon R7 M445 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R7 M445, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200
2014
15 Watt
3.96
+61%

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 outperforms R7 M445 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking708849
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.106.75
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3eMeso
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)15 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384320
Core clock speed300 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz920 MHz
Number of transistors189 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15-25 Watt
Texture fill rate52.8018.40
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPS0.5888 TFLOPS
ROPs68
TMUs4820

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.0
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan+1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 3.96
+61%
R7 M445 2.46

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 1523
+61%
R7 M445 946

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 2766
+25.3%
R7 M445 2208

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 1737
+10%
R7 M445 1579

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 15388
+60%
R7 M445 9617

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
+50%
14
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Atomic Heart 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Fortnite 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Valorant 50−55
+23.8%
40−45
−23.8%
Atomic Heart 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Dota 2 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Fortnite 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+100%
6
−100%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+10%
10
−10%
Valorant 50−55
+23.8%
40−45
−23.8%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Dota 2 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+120%
5
−120%
Valorant 50−55
+23.8%
40−45
−23.8%
Fortnite 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+64.7%
16−18
−64.7%
Valorant 35−40
+95%
20−22
−95%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Fortnite 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Atomic Heart 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Fortnite 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and R7 M445 compete in popular games:

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is 50% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is ahead in 58 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.96 2.46
Recency 5 September 2014 15 May 2016
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has a 61% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

R7 M445, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M445 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
AMD Radeon R7 M445
Radeon R7 M445

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2
88 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6
120 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M445 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Radeon R7 M445, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.