Radeon R6 Graphics vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking764not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.11no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3eSpectre Lite
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 May 2013 (11 years ago)17 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320384
Core clock speed200 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors392 million2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate48.0014.40
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs4024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceRing BusIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem shared + 128 MB eDRAMSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem sharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.0
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2013 17 September 2014
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

R6 Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon R6 Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a notebook card while Radeon R6 Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
Radeon R6 Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 162 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 155 votes

Rate Radeon R6 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.