Radeon R7 350 Fake Card vs Iris Plus Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking720not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.92no data
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2Opal
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512384
Core clock speedno data1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data950 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate32.0025.20
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88
TMUs3224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x8
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared4.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data36.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.1 (1.2)
Vulkan-1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics has a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics and Radeon R7 350 Fake Card. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 485 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 12 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 Fake Card on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics or Radeon R7 350 Fake Card, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.