RTX A500 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) with RTX A500, including specs and performance data.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
2019
12 Watt
5.41

RTX A500 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) by a whopping 224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking608308
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.0420.31
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameIce Lake G7 Gen. 11GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 May 2019 (5 years ago)10 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores642048
Core clock speed300 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1770 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rateno data113.3
Floating-point processing powerno data7.25 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−224%
55−60
+224%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Far Cry 5 12
−192%
35−40
+192%
Far Cry New Dawn 9
−200%
27−30
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−206%
110−120
+206%
Hitman 3 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−214%
110−120
+214%
Metro Exodus 18
−206%
55−60
+206%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12
−192%
35−40
+192%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55
−209%
170−180
+209%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Far Cry 5 11
−218%
35−40
+218%
Far Cry New Dawn 4
−200%
12−14
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−206%
110−120
+206%
Hitman 3 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−214%
110−120
+214%
Metro Exodus 14
−221%
45−50
+221%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9
−200%
27−30
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−224%
55−60
+224%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
Watch Dogs: Legion 51
−214%
160−170
+214%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−206%
110−120
+206%
Hitman 3 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Horizon Zero Dawn 11
−218%
35−40
+218%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15
−200%
45−50
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−200%
27−30
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−213%
150−160
+213%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Hitman 3 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−214%
110−120
+214%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Hitman 3 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and RTX A500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A500 is 224% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.41 17.53
Recency 28 May 2019 10 November 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 60 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has 400% lower power consumption.

RTX A500, on the other hand, has a 224% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is a notebook card while RTX A500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
NVIDIA RTX A500
RTX A500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 237 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 136 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.