GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
2019
12 Watt
5.43

RTX 3050 A Mobile outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) by a whopping 461% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking620192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.9446.61
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameIce Lake G7 Gen. 11GA106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date28 May 2019 (5 years ago)2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores641792
Core clock speed300 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1343 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data75.21
Floating-point processing powerno data4.813 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data56
Tensor Coresno data56
Ray Tracing Coresno data14

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−456%
100−110
+456%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 15
−433%
80−85
+433%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12
−442%
65−70
+442%
Battlefield 5 18
−456%
100−105
+456%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Far Cry 5 12
−442%
65−70
+442%
Fortnite 32
−431%
170−180
+431%
Forza Horizon 4 13
−438%
70−75
+438%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Valorant 60−65
−384%
300−310
+384%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Battlefield 5 16
−431%
85−90
+431%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 39
−438%
210−220
+438%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Dota 2 30
−433%
160−170
+433%
Far Cry 5 10
−450%
55−60
+450%
Fortnite 25
−460%
140−150
+460%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−422%
120−130
+422%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−456%
50−55
+456%
Metro Exodus 5
−440%
27−30
+440%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
−456%
100−105
+456%
Valorant 60−65
−384%
300−310
+384%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−424%
110−120
+424%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Dota 2 28
−436%
150−160
+436%
Far Cry 5 11
−445%
60−65
+445%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−422%
120−130
+422%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−456%
50−55
+456%
Valorant 60−65
−384%
300−310
+384%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 15
−433%
80−85
+433%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−438%
210−220
+438%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−459%
190−200
+459%
Valorant 55−60
−426%
300−310
+426%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−459%
95−100
+459%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Valorant 24−27
−438%
140−150
+438%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and RTX 3050 A Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 A Mobile is 456% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.43 30.48
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 45 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has 275% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 A Mobile, on the other hand, has a 461.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 241 vote

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 11 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) or GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.