Quadro Plex 2200 S4 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking663not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.51no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT3eGT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 April 2018 (6 years ago)25 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384240
Core clock speed300 MHz648 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate50.4051.84
Floating-point processing power0.8064 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs632
TMUs4880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data522 mm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data102.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2018 25 July 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 600 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 655 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 3900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro Plex 2200 S4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a notebook card while Quadro Plex 2200 S4 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Iris Plus Graphics 655
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
Quadro Plex 2200 S4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 339 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 655 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2200 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.