Radeon RX 5500M vs Iris Graphics 540

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Graphics 540 and Radeon RX 5500M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Graphics 540
2015
15 Watt
3.26

RX 5500M outperforms Iris Graphics 540 by a whopping 343% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking742358
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.1511.83
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameSkylake GT3eNavi 14
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)7 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841408
Core clock speed300 MHz1375 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1645 MHz
Number of transistors189 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate48.00144.8
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS4.632 TFLOPS
ROPs632
TMUs4888

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Graphics 540 3.26
RX 5500M 14.43
+343%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Graphics 540 1259
RX 5500M 5568
+342%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Graphics 540 2212
RX 5500M 16476
+645%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Graphics 540 1448
RX 5500M 12276
+748%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Graphics 540 11327
RX 5500M 50946
+350%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Graphics 540 126078
RX 5500M 210925
+67.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
−159%
57
+159%
1440p12−14
−367%
56
+367%
4K6−7
−350%
27
+350%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−817%
55
+817%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−378%
43
+378%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−5500%
56
+5500%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−820%
45−50
+820%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−657%
53
+657%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−617%
43
+617%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−450%
30−35
+450%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−388%
35−40
+388%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−481%
90−95
+481%
Hitman 3 8−9
−625%
58
+625%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−535%
146
+535%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−714%
57
+714%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−254%
45−50
+254%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−333%
169
+333%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−267%
30−35
+267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2500%
26
+2500%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−580%
34
+580%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−586%
48
+586%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−450%
33
+450%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−450%
30−35
+450%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−388%
35−40
+388%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−481%
90−95
+481%
Hitman 3 8−9
−625%
58
+625%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−526%
144
+526%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−800%
36
+800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−643%
52
+643%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−531%
82
+531%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−100%
30−35
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−331%
168
+331%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−244%
31
+244%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1300%
14
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−271%
26
+271%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30
+400%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−450%
30−35
+450%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−481%
90−95
+481%
Hitman 3 8−9
−525%
50
+525%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−200%
69
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−454%
72
+454%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−221%
45
+221%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+77.3%
22
−77.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−671%
54
+671%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−980%
54
+980%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Hitman 3 8−9
−313%
33
+313%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−588%
55
+588%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−806%
163
+806%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−567%
40
+567%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2800%
29
+2800%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−400%
20
+400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10
+0%
10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 9
+0%
9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65
+0%
65
+0%
Metro Exodus 28
+0%
28
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how Iris Graphics 540 and RX 5500M compete in popular games:

  • RX 5500M is 159% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5500M is 367% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5500M is 350% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Graphics 540 is 77% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 5500M is 5500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Graphics 540 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RX 5500M is ahead in 61 test (85%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.26 14.43
Recency 1 September 2015 7 October 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 85 Watt

Iris Graphics 540 has 466.7% lower power consumption.

RX 5500M, on the other hand, has a 342.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5500M is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Graphics 540 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Graphics 540
Iris Graphics 540
AMD Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 92 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 351 vote

Rate Radeon RX 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.