FireStream 9270 vs ION 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared ION 2 with FireStream 9270, including specs and performance data.


ION 2
2008
20 Watt
0.30

FireStream 9270 outperforms ION 2 by a whopping 970% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1391798
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.161.54
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGT218RV770
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)13 November 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16800
Core clock speed500 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors260 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00030.00
Floating-point processing power0.03424 TFLOPS1.2 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs840
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cache32 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data115.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Valorant 24−27
−938%
270−280
+938%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Dota 2 9−10
−956%
95−100
+956%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Valorant 24−27
−938%
270−280
+938%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Dota 2 9−10
−956%
95−100
+956%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Valorant 24−27
−938%
270−280
+938%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Valorant 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 3.21
Recency 3 June 2008 13 November 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 160 Watt

ION 2 has a 38% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9270, on the other hand, has a 970% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 months.

The FireStream 9270 is our recommended choice as it beats the ION 2 in performance tests.

Be aware that ION 2 is a notebook graphics card while FireStream 9270 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 27 votes

Rate ION 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about ION 2 or FireStream 9270, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.