UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs HD Graphics P630

#ad 
Buy
HD Graphics P530 HD Graphics P630
VS
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G4 UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics P630 with UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics P630
2016
1740 MB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
2.68
+125%

HD Graphics P630 outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) by a whopping 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7751027
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.219.46
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2Gen. 11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 August 2016 (8 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19224
Core clock speed350 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40no data
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1no data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4no data
Maximum RAM amount1740 MBno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.1.103-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
+125%
8
−125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Fortnite 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Valorant 45−50
+35.3%
30−35
−35.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+206%
18
−206%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Dota 2 27−30
+133%
12
−133%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Fortnite 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+167%
3
−167%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Valorant 45−50
+35.3%
30−35
−35.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Dota 2 27−30
+155%
11
−155%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Valorant 45−50
+35.3%
30−35
−35.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
Valorant 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how HD Graphics P630 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics P630 is 125% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD Graphics P630 is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, HD Graphics P630 surpassed UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) in all 44 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.68 1.19
Recency 5 August 2016 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 4 Watt

HD Graphics P630 has a 125.2% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics P630 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics P630 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel HD Graphics P630
HD Graphics P630
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5650 Mobility Radeon HD 5650
HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630
vs
R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Iris Plus Graphics 640 Iris Plus Graphics 640
vs
RX Vega 24 Mobile Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile
Iris Plus Graphics 640 Iris Plus Graphics 640
vs
UHD Graphics 32EU UHD Graphics 32EU
Iris Plus Graphics 640 Iris Plus Graphics 640
vs
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation
R7 M445 Radeon R7 M445
vs
HD 7730M Radeon HD 7730M
HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630
vs
RX Vega 2 Radeon RX Vega 2
GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070
vs
HD Graphics 400 HD Graphics 400
GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070
vs
HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
GTX 980 Ti GeForce GTX 980 Ti
vs
Tesla M6 Tesla M6
GTX 980 Ti GeForce GTX 980 Ti
vs
A100 SXM4 80 GB A100 SXM4 80 GB
R9 Fury Radeon R9 Fury
vs
GTX 570 GeForce GTX 570

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 122 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics P630 or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.