GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs HD Graphics P630

Place in the ranking	764	189
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	14.31	18.23
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Kaby Lake GT2	TU106
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	5 August 2016 (8 years ago)	29 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	1920
Core clock speed	350 MHz	960 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm++	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.40	144.0
Floating-point processing power	0.4224 TFLOPS	4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	48
TMUs	24	120
Tensor Cores	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	IGP	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1740 MB	6 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	no data	+
Quick Sync	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.103	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10−12 −940%	104 +940%
1440p	6−7 −1000%	66 +1000%
4K	4−5 −950%	42 +950%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −436%	55−60 +436%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −800%	60−65 +800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −1025%	90 +1025%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −436%	55−60 +436%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −343%	31 +343%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −893%	149 +893%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −2533%	75−80 +2533%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −1267%	82 +1267%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −809%	100 +809%
Valorant	4−5 −3400%	140 +3400%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −1225%	106 +1225%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −436%	55−60 +436%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −243%	24 +243%
Dota 2	9−10 −1000%	99 +1000%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −312%	70 +312%
Fortnite	16−18 −747%	140−150 +747%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −720%	123 +720%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −2533%	75−80 +2533%
Grand Theft Auto V	9−10 −900%	90 +900%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −917%	61 +917%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −782%	247 +782%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −309%	45 +309%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −827%	100−110 +827%
Valorant	4−5 −1925%	81 +1925%
World of Tanks	55−60 −398%	270−280 +398%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −850%	76 +850%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −436%	55−60 +436%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −200%	21 +200%
Dota 2	9−10 −1144%	112 +1144%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −618%	122 +618%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −613%	107 +613%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −2533%	75−80 +2533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −200%	84 +200%
Valorant	4−5 −2975%	123 +2975%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	1−2 −5200%	50−55 +5200%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 −2600%	50−55 +2600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −695%	170−180 +695%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1350%	29 +1350%
World of Tanks	21−24 −838%	190−200 +838%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −1933%	61 +1933%
Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −1200%	24−27 +1200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −250%	14 +250%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1075%	90−95 +1075%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −4100%	80−85 +4100%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −1125%	45−50 +1125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −700%	45−50 +700%
Valorant	10−11 −770%	87 +770%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Dota 2	16−18 −244%	55−60 +244%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −989%	98 +989%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −900%	20 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −244%	55−60 +244%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −1450%	31 +1450%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −200%	6 +200%
Dota 2	16−18 −444%	87 +444%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1300%	40−45 +1300%
Fortnite	2−3 −1850%	39 +1850%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −4700%	45−50 +4700%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 −2600%	27−30 +2600%
Valorant	3−4 −1267%	41 +1267%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Metro Exodus

65−70

+0%

65−70

+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus

24−27

+0%

24−27

+0%

This is how HD Graphics P630 and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 Mobile is 940% faster in 1080p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 1000% faster in 1440p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 950% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 Mobile is 5200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2060 Mobile is ahead in 62 tests (97%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.00	29.29
Recency	5 August 2016	29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1740 MB	6 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	115 Watt

HD Graphics P630 has 666.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 876.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 253.1% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics P630 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.