Arc A380 vs HD Graphics P530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics P530 and Arc A380, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics P530
2015
1740 MB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
2.78

Arc A380 outperforms HD Graphics P530 by a whopping 479% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking791328
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.64
Power efficiency12.8314.86
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921024
Core clock speed350 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors189 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate18.40131.2
Floating-point processing power0.4416 TFLOPS4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs332
TMUs1664
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data222 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1740 MB6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1937 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data186.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1.971.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics P530 2.78
Arc A380 16.09
+479%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics P530 1074
Arc A380 6208
+478%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8−9
−513%
49
+513%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.04

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−578%
61
+578%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4900%
50
+4900%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−2325%
95−100
+2325%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1240%
65−70
+1240%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−986%
75−80
+986%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1071%
160−170
+1071%
Hitman 3 8−9
−675%
60−65
+675%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−529%
130−140
+529%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−3267%
100−110
+3267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−758%
100−110
+758%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−197%
110−120
+197%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−700%
72
+700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3600%
37
+3600%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−2325%
95−100
+2325%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1240%
65−70
+1240%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−986%
75−80
+986%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1071%
160−170
+1071%
Hitman 3 8−9
−675%
60−65
+675%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−529%
130−140
+529%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−3267%
100−110
+3267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−567%
80
+567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−350%
60−65
+350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−197%
110−120
+197%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−222%
29
+222%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3000%
31
+3000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1240%
65−70
+1240%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−307%
57
+307%
Hitman 3 8−9
−675%
60−65
+675%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−148%
52
+148%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−408%
61
+408%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−143%
34
+143%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+52%
25
−52%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1020%
55−60
+1020%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1450%
30−35
+1450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
Hitman 3 8−9
−350%
35−40
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−786%
60−65
+786%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1850%
35−40
+1850%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−900%
160−170
+900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 40−45
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 14−16

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−550%
24−27
+550%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how HD Graphics P530 and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A380 is 513% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD Graphics P530 is 52% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc A380 is 4900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD Graphics P530 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Arc A380 is ahead in 54 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.78 16.09
Recency 1 September 2015 14 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1740 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

HD Graphics P530 has 400% lower power consumption.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has a 478.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 253.1% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A380 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P530 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P530
HD Graphics P530
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 23 votes

Rate HD Graphics P530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 809 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.