Radeon Pro 575X vs HD Graphics P4600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking965not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.30no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2Polaris 20
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)18 March 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1602048
Core clock speed350 MHz1096 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00140.3
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS4.489 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs20128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data217.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.801.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2013 18 March 2019
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 120 Watt

HD Graphics P4600 has 42.9% lower power consumption.

Pro 575X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics P4600 and Radeon Pro 575X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics P4600 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 575X is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P4600
HD Graphics P4600
AMD Radeon Pro 575X
Radeon Pro 575X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 35 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 23 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.