Radeon R7 A360 vs HD Graphics (Haswell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Haswell) and Radeon R7 A360, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics (Haswell)
2012
0.79

R7 A360 outperforms HD Graphics (Haswell) by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12071031
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 7.5 Haswell (2012)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameHaswell GT1Meso
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 October 2012 (13 years ago)5 May 2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10384
Core clock speed200 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1125 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data27.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.864 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.0
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6
−66.7%
10−12
+66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Valorant 30−33
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Valorant 30−33
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Valorant 30−33
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Valorant 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

This is how HD Graphics (Haswell) and R7 A360 compete in popular games:

  • R7 A360 is 67% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 1.47
Recency 1 October 2012 5 May 2015
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm

HD Graphics (Haswell) has a 27% more advanced lithography process.

R7 A360, on the other hand, has a 86% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

The Radeon R7 A360 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Haswell) in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 32 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Haswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 A360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Haswell) or Radeon R7 A360, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.