GMA 3150 vs HD Graphics (Broadwell)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Broadwell) and GMA 3150, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics (Broadwell)
2015
0.97
+9600%

HD Graphics (Broadwell) outperforms GMA 3150 by a whopping 9600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11211537
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.05
ArchitectureGen. 8 Broadwell (2015)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT1Pineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2015 (10 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1216
Core clock speed100 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data123 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data13 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.8
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64/128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)9.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Elden Ring 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Elden Ring 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1
World of Tanks 21−24 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 0−1
World of Tanks 5−6 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1
Valorant 6−7 0−1

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Valorant 1−2 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 0.01
Recency 5 January 2015 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm

HD Graphics (Broadwell) has a 9600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics (Broadwell) is our recommended choice as it beats the GMA 3150 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 6 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Broadwell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 141 vote

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.