Radeon R7 M365X vs HD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 630 and Radeon R7 M365X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 630
2017
64 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 15 Watt
2.68
+52.3%

HD Graphics 630 outperforms R7 M365X by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking778900
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.18no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2Litho
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 January 2017 (8 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192384
Compute unitsno data6
Core clock speed350 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistors189 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate24.0023.04
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS0.7373 TFLOPS
ROPs38
TMUs2424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+
Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL3.0Not Listed
Vulkan+-
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 630 2.68
+52.3%
R7 M365X 1.76

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 630 1197
+52.5%
R7 M365X 785

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
+60%
10−12
−60%
1440p64
+60%
40−45
−60%
4K13
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 6
+100%
3−4
−100%
Fortnite 24
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Valorant 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Dota 2 26
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Fortnite 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 4
+100%
2−3
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 2
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Valorant 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Dota 2 22
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Valorant 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Valorant 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Valorant 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how HD Graphics 630 and R7 M365X compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 630 is 60% faster in 1080p
  • HD Graphics 630 is 60% faster in 1440p
  • HD Graphics 630 is 63% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.68 1.76
Recency 1 January 2017 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

HD Graphics 630 has a 52.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M365X in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 630
AMD Radeon R7 M365X
Radeon R7 M365X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1333 votes

Rate HD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 55 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M365X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 630 or Radeon R7 M365X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.